Updated
Case evidence: Read the source breakdown report · View case frames and shot timings
Based on a published tool report. Production classifications are analytical judgments; suggested steps are not the original project or a verified recreation.
The scene is right, but the motion is wrong
Write the start state, one visible action and the end state. Keep camera movement on a separate line. If you describe only a still frame, the model has little guidance about what should change. In the unboxing example, “headphone box on a carpet” omits the sponge motion that defines the shot.
The character changes between cuts
The dialogue report separates character shots from interface and title shots. Keep a consistent character description and permitted reference assets across character shots. Test continuity before assembling the full sequence. A text prompt alone cannot guarantee the same face, costume or pose across independent generations.
The captions or interface look wrong
In the dialogue case, shots 2 and 3 include text overlays in addition to character footage. Treat these as separate production tasks: generate or shoot the base image, then typeset the exact words. For a real interface, use a recording or rebuild the required layout rather than asking a video model to invent readable controls.
The clip looks similar but feels too slow
Use the reference cut points: the dialogue report places shot 2 at 00:01.375–00:02.833 and shot 3 at 00:02.833–00:03.875. Compare action timing and cut timing separately. Trim usable footage, then align speech and effects. Adding “fast-paced” to every prompt is not a substitute for setting edit points.
Keep a small test log
Record the input reference, prompt, model settings you actually used, result and one next change. Score framing, motion, identity, text and timing separately. If a change helps one dimension but harms another, keep the evidence instead of declaring the whole prompt successful. The report cited here is source analysis; these troubleshooting steps have not been benchmarked across models.
A reusable analysis template
Reference shot / time range: Observed mismatch: Layer: picture / camera / text / audio / edit One change to try: Settings and output saved: Result: improved / unchanged / worse Next decision:
Practice with a real report
Use shots 2 and 3 to practice separating character continuity, overlay typography and cut timing.
Open the case and download its report →Continue your workflow
- Video to prompt: translate observations into instructions
- YouTube video to prompt: analyze a reference shot by shot
- How to reverse engineer video prompts from a reference
- How to reverse engineer a video, shot by shot
- Veo 3 prompts: build them shot by shot from a reference
- Sora prompts: write them shot by shot from a reference
- Get started in Claude Code or Codex